Fast Amendments to the Fast-track Approvals Act

Environment & Planning
Nov 14 2025
Aiming to capitalise on faster-tracked consenting the Government has introduced the Fast-track Approvals Amendment Bill.

While marketed at improving grocery competition through supermarket-specific consenting options, the Bill in fact provides much more nuance.

The Bill has had its first reading and is referred to the Environment Select Committee for consideration. Its proposals are indicative of the Government’s quick clean-up of large-scale resource consenting and prioritisation of super market development.

The significant changes are as follows:

  1. The creation of panels and their decision-making would be streamlined under the Bill. Panel conveners would have 15 working days to set up a panel after receiving notice to do so (Clause 29).
  2. Panels would then be required to make their decisions no later than 90 working days from the panel’s establishment, unless otherwise agreed by the applicant (Clause 44). This includes 10 working days for the panel to invite written comments, 20 working days to receive these comments, and a proposed maximum of 60 working days after receiving these comments to make their decisions.
  3. In saving more time the Bill will facilitate amendments to listed projects under Schedule 2 (Clause 54). The proposed Section 117A allows corrections to the project description and approximate geographical location of a listed project. These changes may only be made by the Governor-General, by Order in Council, at the Minister’s recommendation. Changes to the regional or national significance of the project, its purpose, and its location, scale and nature will influence the Minister’s recommendation.
  4. The Bill eases consultation requirements proposing that councils, iwi authorities, hapū, treaty settlement entities, and administering agencies need only be notified of a referral application or a substantive application for a listed project as opposed to being consulted (Clauses 6(2) and 14). These entities would have 20 working days to provide a response to the applicant.
  5. The introduction of Government Policy Statements look to provide a clear picture of the Government’s view on the benefits of certain regional or national infrastructure or development projects (Clause 5). Relevant statements must be considered when assessing a referral application or deciding approvals in a substantive application. Such clarity might leave little to speculation and add weight to these decisions.
  6. The Bill would allow the modification or withdrawal of approvals sought in lodged substantive applications prior to the panel making its decisions at the Minister’s discretion (Clause 42).
  7. Across the Bill decision makers are given power, with specified time constraints, to request and gather further information from the applicant where necessary. This includes information related to:
    a. The MfE’s determination that a referral application is complete and within scope (Clause 8); and
    b. The EPA’s determination that a substantive application is complete and within scope, (Clause 25).
  8. Comments by third parties on referral and substantive applications have been specifically narrowed:
    a. Comments on referral applications would be specifically invited from the Minister for Māori Crown Relations and the Minister for Māori Development. Comments from an administering agency or local authority would need to be relevant to the application and its decision (Clause 9).
    b. Comments on substantive applications would also need to be similarly relevant. Any other persons invited to comment are restricted from doing so unless an administering agency or local authority does not sufficiently address the matter or does not intend to comment on it (Clause 33).
  9. As part of its proposal a referral application would, under the Bill, need to outline not only the potential and known adverse effects of the project on the environment but also the significance of those effects (Clause 7(1)).

These proposed changes may well expedite fast-track resource consenting by compressing timeframes and limiting powers. We would expect this to result in faster decision-making.

Scroll to Top