The Government intends to introduce its second RMA amendment bill and a suite of changes to national direction to “drive economic growth and productivity”, RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop says.
Following the first RMA amendment Bill introduced to Parliament earlier this year, the next stage of the Government’s RMA reform, prior to full replacement, is aimed to be achieved by a second RMA amendment bill (RM Bill 2) and a suite of national policy changes through introduction of a ‘national direction package’.
The intention is for the RM Bill 2 to be introduced to Parliament before the end of this year, and then passed into law by mid-2025. The national direction package will follow the same timeline and this bill.
The Government has divided the RM Bill 2 and the national direction package into four categories: infrastructure and energy, housing, farming and the primary sector, and emergencies and natural hazards. The reforms proposed under each topic are as follows:
Infrastructure and Energy
- Improved delivery of renewable energy development by giving effect to National’s Electrify NZ. The Electrify NZ policy can be found here, which intends to “cut red tape to drive investment in renewable electricity generation.”
- A new NPS for Infrastructure which intends to ensure that resource management decisions consistently enable infrastructure to be development, operated, and maintained whilst also managing its effects on the natural environment.
- Amendments to the NES for Telecommunications to keep it up to date with developments and give telcos greater certainty and reduced consenting costs as they upgrade their infrastructure.
- Changes to the resource management system to ensure a consistent approach to quarrying.
- Inclusion of port operators and emergency service providers as requiring authorities.
- Extension of the default designation lapse period from 5 years to 10 years.
- Extension of the duration of port coastal permits by 20 years.
Housing
- Delivery of the ‘first pillar’ of the Government’s Going for Housing Growth policy. We discussed this policy, and the objectives of the first pillar, in our previous article here.
- Development of a new NES for Minor Residential Units (i.e. granny flats).
- Development of a new national direction for papakāinga housing, that will require each district plan to contain provisions to enable more papakāinga housing.
- Simplifying the way that heritage is managed.
Farming and the Primary Sector
- Immediate national direction changes will be made to enable development of renewable energy, indoor primary production and greenhouses on highly productive land. We discussed the changes to the NPS on Highly Productive Land in our earlier article here.
- Further announcements are expected from the Government’s Agriculture and Primary Sector team on what changes will be made to this sector under this second tranche of reforms. Minister Bishop has indicated that these will largely give effect to a collection of promises made in the National Party’s manifesto and coalition agreements.
Emergencies and Natural Hazards
- To further develop the NPS for Natural Hazards so that it will provide a comprehensive, nationally consistent framework for addressing the risks posed by natural hazards, including increased risk from climate change. The NPS for Natural Hazards will provide direction to councils on how to identify natural hazards, assess the risk they pose and respond to that risk through planning controls.
- The RM Bill 2 proposes to better enable rapid responses to disasters by improving emergency provisions including a new regulation making power for emergency responses.
Alongside these four packages, a range of technical changes are proposed to improve the resource management system’s coherence. Whilst the precise form of these changes is yet to be released, what is apparent is that the coalition Government is being consistent with its position to undertake vast and quick reforms of our resource management system.
Holland Beckett is experienced in providing advice to clients on the current reforms to New Zealand’s resource management system. If you have any questions about these reforms, please feel free to contact us.
Bridget Bailey
Tauranga
tel:+6472620426
mailto:bridget.bailey@hobec.co.nz
Cory Lipinski
Tauranga
tel:+6472620426
mailto:cory.lipinski@hobec.co.nz
You may also like ...
Solar Development – documenting land rights
The market for solar farms is continuing to grow in New Zealand with an increasing number of landowners being approached by solar developers. It is interesting to see the various approaches being taken by solar developers when it comes to documenting land rights with landowners (i.e. option agreement, lease and/or easement).
The process for documenting a solar development stems from a Letter of Intent / Heads of Terms, to more formal binding agreements such as an Investigation License, Option to Lease and ends with a Lease or Easement.
We have provided a brief summary for each document as follows:
Letter of Intent (“LOI”) / Heads of Terms (“HOT”)
This document sets out the key commercial terms that will form the basis of the Investigation Licence/ Option to Lease and the Lease or Easement.
Generally the only binding terms of this document are terms regarding exclusivity and confidentiality. This means that the landowner cannot disclose the proposed commercial terms of the project to a third party (except for your professional advisors). The Landowner will also be prohibited to deal with any other solar developer named on the LOI / HOT for the term of the exclusivity.
Investigation Licence / Option to Lease
The Investigation Licence (also referred to as an Option to Lease) grants the developer a timeframe to investigate the land, carry out their due diligence, secure finance to fund the solar project, obtain resource consent and any other required consents and obtain Overseas Investment Office approval (if applicable).
Typically the Investigation Licence is granted for 3 - 4 years and the developer will pay the landowner an upfront compensation payment (in the form of a licence fee, signing bonus or other) for the right to tie up the landowners land for this period of time.
The Investigation Licence will annex the form of lease which the parties will be bound by should the developer exercise an Option Notice.
If the developer exercises their right to lease the land the developer will issue an ‘Option Notice’. The parties will then enter into a Lease to govern the relationship from the Lease commencement date onwards, with the developer being the tenant and the landowner being the landlord.
Careful consideration needs to be taken by landowners to ensure not only legal aspects are covered but also just as important, the practical factors (ie. crop / stock compensation, access to land during calving etc).
Lease
The terms for the Lease are substantially, if not completely, agreed to at the time that the Investigation Licence is entered into by the parties.
The Lease will not only set out the rights and obligations of the parties relating to the land which the developer exercises its Option Notice over but it should also address the rights and obligations of the parties over the balance of the landowner’s land not subject to the Lease. These rights include whether any easements for electricity and access are required to be granted over the balance of the land for the operation of the solar development.
The Lease will also likely include a clause for requiring the landowner to enter into a Tripartite Agreement (discussed further below), a CPI rent review mechanism, whether any grazing licences are to be granted over the leased area, decommission of the project, assignment and many more important provisions.
Any reinstatement obligations that the developer (as tenant) is required to comply with once the Lease has ended should also be addressed within the Lease.
Contrary to the above, we have seen some solar developers in New Zealand document the rights and obligations of the parties within an easement. These interests are exempt under the Overseas Investment Act 2005 if they meet the Overseas Investment Office’s (“OIO”) criteria of an easement arrangement. However the OIO has indicated that easements are not an appropriate arrangement to be used for solar farms.
Tripartite Agreement
One notable feature that we are increasingly seeing in solar farm leases (and sometimes even in the Investigation Licences) is the requirement for the landowner to enter into a Tripartite Agreement, also known as a Direct Agreement. These agreements involve three parties in the context of a solar farm lease, being the landowner, the developer and the developer\'s financier.
The purpose of a Tripartite Agreement is to regulate the three parties in respect of the solar farm lease and record certain arrangements between them, including but not limited to the process in the event of a default under the Lease. Generally a Tripartite Agreement is a developer financier driven agreement which grants the developer\'s financier the right to step into the shoes of the developer (as tenant) and become a party to the Lease in place of the developer (as tenant). Usually this would only be in a situation when the tenant is in financial trouble or has failed to remedy a breach. The developer’s financier thereby assumes some or all of the rights and obligations under the Lease as if it were the developer. This provides security to both the landlord and the financier to the extent that in the event of a developer (as tenant) default (i.e. does not pay rent), the financier has the right to step in and remedy the breach (i.e. pay the rent) to ensure the landlord does not terminate the Lease resulting in the financier losing its significant investment in the solar development. However, the Tripartite Agreement also includes additional onerous provisions which often supersede existing Lease terms which a landlord needs to be aware of. For example the Tripartite Agreement may extend the period of time which a tenant has to remedy any breach (cure period) or prohibit the landlord from being able to terminate the Lease or suspend the performance of any of the landowner’s obligations (as landlord) unless the notice periods and obligations under the Tripartite Agreement are first complied with.
If you would like to discuss any solar matters or have been approached by a solar developer please contact us.
Kōwhai Park Solar Project Financial Close
Holland Beckett is pleased to have assisted Lightsource BP and Contact Energy on the development of the Kōwhai Park solar project and reaching financial close, including property, connection agreement and construction matters.
Kōwhai Park Solar Farm is located on the Christchurch International Airport Limited campus and is the first phase of the airport’s renewable energy precinct. The 168MWp solar farm will have around 300,000 panels spanning 230 hectares and will be one of New Zealand’s largest solar farms. Once operational, it will generate enough electricity to power the equivalent of approximately 36,000 homes.
The Holland Beckett team was led by partners Joel Murphy and Ken Hawkes. Other Holland Beckett team members included Montie Baskett, Emily Merrill and Giorgia Robertson.
Clearing the pathway for consenting on highly productive land
Recent amendments to the NPS-HPL include clearing the pathway for consenting specified infrastructure, greenhouses and indoor primary production on highly productive land.
There is now a clear consenting pathway for development of specified infrastructure (e.g. renewable energy), greenhouses and intensive indoor primary production on highly productive land (HPL) following recent amendments to the National Policy Statement for Highly Productive Land (NPS-HPL).
We had previously discussed the issues and proposed amendments to the NPS-HPL identified by the Ministry and Minister for the Environment in a previous article from October last year (linked here). Following consultation and submitter feedback, the Minister for the Environment has this month made changes to the NPS-HPL that we anticipate will better enable development of intensive primary production, greenhouse activities, and specified infrastructure on HPL.
The NPS-HPL sets strict standards for how HPL can be used and essentially provides that any use or development of HPL must be avoided unless such use or activity falls within one of the limited exceptions. After the NPS-HPL came into effect some renewable electricity generators and representatives from the food production sector raised concerns that it placed undue restrictions on development of activities that may have a need to be located on HPL. The two key issues identified by these parties were:
The lack of clarity in the consenting pathway for new specified infrastructure on HPL, as notably no express provision for the construction of this type of infrastructure was provided for in the NPS-HPL. Specified infrastructure includes (but is not limited to) renewable electricity infrastructure; and
The absence of a clear consenting pathway for developing and relocating intensive indoor primary production and greenhouses on HPL.
The following changes have been made to the NPS-HPL to address these concerns:
Amendments to cl 3.9(2)(j)(i) NPS-HPL that will better enable the development of new specified infrastructure on HPL. Clause 3.9(2)(j)(i) NPS-HPL has been varied to now provide that the development, operation or decommissioning of specified infrastructure, including (but not limited to) construction, maintenance, upgrade, expansion, replacement or removal may be undertaken on HPL if certain requirements set out in the NPS-HPL are met.
Inclusion of a subclause that better enables development on HPL where such development provides for either ‘intensive indoor primary production’ or ‘greenhouse activities’ (cl 3.9(2)(aa)). Definitions for ‘intensive indoor primary production’ and ‘greenhouse activities’ are now also included in cl 1.3 NPS-HPL.
These amendments provide a clear consenting pathway for development of specified infrastructure, greenhouses and intensive indoor primary production on HPL. If you have any questions regarding the NPS-HPL, or what these recent changes may mean for your or your business, please feel free to contact us.