Sarah Burns

Qualifications

LLB University of Waikato 2021
Admitted to the Bar in New Zealand 2021
NZ Law Society Legal Executive Diploma 2016

Community Activity

Trustee of the Tauranga Community Foodbank

Contact

DDI: +64 7 927 2237
M: +64 27 304 1862
E: sarah.burns@hobec.co.nz

Sarah is a Solicitor in Hilary Anderson’s property and commercial team.

Sarah has been employed with Holland Beckett since 2015. She began her journey with the firm as a legal secretary and shortly after completed her Legal Executive Diploma. Sarah then progressed and completed her law degree at the University of Waikato in 2021 whilst still working at the firm.

Having worked closely with Dean Thompson for many years until his retirement, Sarah has broad experience with private and commercial clients on property and financing transactions, along with specialist knowledge in trusts, asset protection and succession planning.

Sarah provides straightforward pragmatic advice.

Sarah Burns's Expertise

Trusts, Asset Protection & Estate Planning

Property Law

Commercial Law

Sarah Burns's News & Resources

Land Covenants – protecting or preventing development?

Land covenants are very commonplace in modern subdivisions and often impose significant restrictions on the way a property can be developed and used, now and into the future (sometimes indefinitely). While usually intended to promote and protect the amenity of subdivisions and preserve property values in the years to come, covenants can stymie development, prevent neighbourhoods from moving with the times and create difficulties for owners trying to renovate and extend or sell their properties. Common issues are: Requirements that the developer or other third party approve in writing any plans and specifications for construction of buildings on the land. Often these requirements are overlooked, and approval is not actually sought or there is nothing in writing to show that this requirement was complied with. This causes issues when the property is sold as a purchaser inherits (and could be required to fix) any covenant compliance issues when they buy a property. These requirements can also be written in such a way that it’s not clear whether approval has to be obtained for the initial construction of buildings on a property, or whether the obligation is ongoing and approval must be obtained for any new additional buildings (like a tiny home or extra garage) or changes to original buildings - which would cause further issues if the developer no longer exists. Prohibitions on subdivision or the number of dwellings that can be constructed. It is very common for covenants to specify that only a single dwelling can be constructed on a property, which can prevent an owner from redevelopments such as converting their property into a home and income and inhibits intensification of residential land. Inflexible material requirements, like obligations to use only certain types of cladding, which have become obsolete or problematic over time. These requirements can also prevent the use of new superior materials and building innovations. It is possible to put a time limit on covenants and to update or remove them, but the process of doing so (if not provided for in the original registered covenants) can be painful. Updates or removal can be done by: Obtaining the consent of all owners in the affected subdivision - but often this is simply not practical due to the number of impacted owners or the risk of one or more owners refusing to cooperate or requiring some sort of payment to do so. Making a Court application for an order under sections 316 and 317 of the Property Law Act 2007. Court proceedings can be costly and lengthy, with no guarantee of success. To be successful, an owner would have to convince the Court that: There has been some relevant change (such as the use of the land or in the character of the neighbourhood) which means that the covenant should be modified or removed; The continuation of the covenant as is would impede the reasonable use of the property; and There is no-one who will be substantially detrimentally impacted by the modification or removal of the covenant. If you are considering buying, selling, developing or redeveloping a property that you know or suspect is affected by covenants, it is prudent to check the property’s title and understand the impact the covenants may have on your plans and what your options. Our property team can assist with this, please get in touch.

Are you purchasing your first home? Completing a Kiwisaver First Home Withdrawal may help you get on the property ladder.

To complete a Kiwisaver First Home Withdrawal you need to have been a member for at least three years. These funds must be applied toward the purchase of a residential property which you intend to live in for at least six months. If eligible, you can withdraw all your Kiwisaver savings other than $1,000 which you must keep in your Kiwisaver account. The funds from your First Home Withdrawal may either be applied towards the payment of a deposit where you have entered a conditional agreement or towards the balance required to purchase the property on the settlement date. A withdrawal application cannot be completed until you have a signed agreement to purchase a property. Most Kiwisaver providers take between ten to fifteen working days to process a withdrawal on receipt of your fully signed application. The amount of days your particular provider requires is set out on their respective first home withdrawal form which can be found online. Depending on whether you are wanting to use Kiwisaver funds for the deposit on the unconditional date or on the settlement date, you need to ensure that you give your provider enough time before your required date to complete the withdrawal. This can catch out first home buyers wanting to use their Kiwisaver funds to pay a deposit on a property going to auction, as at auction the deposit is usually payable the same day you sign the agreement upon your winning bid. The withdrawal forms include a statutory declaration to be signed whereby you declare that you are eligible to make the withdrawal. Only certain people can witness signing of the statutory declaration including a Solicitor, Justice of the Peace or Notary Public. These forms also include a letter to be signed by your Solicitor. It is important that you factor in these signing arrangements when determining the timeframes required to withdraw funds. Once your application is processed by your provider, your Kiwisaver funds are paid to your solicitor. Your solicitor will then use these funds to either make payment of the deposit or towards the purchase price on settlement. We are well experienced at dealing with Kiwisaver providers. If you have any questions or would like any assistance with buying your first home, please get in contact with one of our property solicitors.

A Tradition of Generosity. What are you doing with your TECT rebate?

For 15 years now, Holland Beckett has been donating their TECT rebate to the Tauranga Community Foodbank. This tradition began at the end of 2009 when the global financial crisis was putting pressure on many and the Foodbank was strained to provide for those who needed them, with Christmas just around the corner. Unfortunately, the global financial crisis that started this initiative has been replaced by a housing and cost of living crisis and the demand on the Foodbank only increases. What began as a one-off donation where the firm saw a need, has now become a long-standing tradition. Holland Beckett’s Bill Holland has been the chairman of TECT since 2014, leading the organisation though transformational change into a community trust. “Tect has been absolutely transformational for Tauranga. The contribution to the community ... is now in excess of a massive $20m a year\". Bill was named a Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit in this year’s King’s Birthday Honours List, for services to community governance and philanthropy. The firm is proud to also champion ‘community’ as one of its core values, committed to supporting the BOP community in a variety of ways. The firm views the TECT dividends as windfall, not allocated in the budget, and so it is easy to pass on to a good cause. It is a way of closing the loop and returning the profits generated by TECT to the community. Fifteen years later and that initial idea has grown into something really meaningful, with Hobec\'s rebates gifted to Tauranga Community Foodbank now totaling $29, 843. Hobec Solicitor Sarah Burns is on the Board of the Tauranga Community Foodbank - “We are immensely grateful to Holland Beckett for their annual donation. The Foodbank has been around since 1991, over this period demand has continued to grow and as a result so has our need for donations and volunteers. On average, the Foodbank provides over 20,000 meals a month to those in our community. We know right now a large number of households are really struggling due to the current economic environment, with the generosity of our donors we are able to step in and ensure these families don’t go without nutritious meals.” With TECT rebates to be distributed for years to come, Holland Beckett will continue to pass these on to the Tauranga Community Foodbank as one of the firms many charity initiatives. If you are also a recipient of the rebate, in the spirit of TECT, why not consider also paying it forward?

Incapacitated Trustee

The Trustee Act 1956 reigned for over 60 years before the Trusts Act 2019 (“the Act”) came into force. The Act aims to simplify Trust-related issues by providing mandatory and default administrative trustee duties. One scenario under the spotlight is the process of removing an incapacitated trustee. Many Trusts that were established in the ‘Trust boom’ around 20 years ago may now be faced with a trustee who is losing capacity. This can be a tricky situation when trustees are trying to deal with Trust assets, especially in a family context. Fortunately, a Court order is no longer needed to remove a trustee. Trustees can now exercise a compulsory removal of a trustee if they lose capacity (s104 of the Act). This can apply regardless of what your Trust Deed specifies, or fails to specify, in respect of removing an incapacitated trustee. It is then the question of who has the power to remove that trustee which is a case of reviewing the Trust Deed together with the Act. Removal of an incapacitated trustee is a compulsory ground of removal available to the Appointer and if the trustee has lost the capacity to perform the functions of a trustee then it would make sense to remove them. Review your Trust Deed first Your Trust Deed may specifically nominate someone with the power to remove trustees. That person may remove a trustee in accordance with their Trust powers or by using s104 of the Act. The Act’s processes may be more suited in some circumstances. If the Trust Deed is silent on the removal of an incapacitated trustee then follow the Act The Act’s process is used to account for the situation that the Trust Deed has not anticipated. In reality this is quite common and a good incentive to review or amend your Trust Deed. The Act states if the nominated person in the Trust Deed is unwilling or unable to remove the incapacitated trustee then the remaining trustees can do so. If there are no remaining trustees or they are unwilling to act, then further individuals may be granted the power to remove. They can include: a property manager appointed under the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 to act as manager of the trustee’s property, or; a person holding an enduring power of attorney over the property of the incapacitated trustee, or a liquidator of a corporate trustee that is in liquidation. A medical certificate confirming that the trustee of concern no longer has the capacity to carry out the role of a trustee will form the basis of the documentation required to give effect to the removal. Holland Beckett Law can guide you through this process.

Changing the Trustees of your Trust

There is currently a Bill before Parliament that will amend many aspects of Trust Law contained in the Trustee Act of 1956. The amendments are likely to come into force in 2019. In anticipation of the overhaul of Trust Law it is a good time to consider whether the current trustees of your Trust are still the best people for the role. There are various circumstances which may cause you to consider changing a trustee: Change in Circumstances A change in a trustee’s personal circumstances can have a direct impact on Trust management. For example, depending on how active your Trust is, a trustee moving overseas creates a geographical barrier that can transform into an administrative circus. With the increasing compliance obligations there are more and more documents for trustees to sign in accordance with specific witnessing requirements, so needing documents to be signed overseas is an added administration expense. In addition, having a trustee based outside of New Zealand can have significant tax implications. Ageing Trustees A trustee displaying early signs of dementia or another long-term medical illness should not be taken lightly. Trust Deeds typically direct that all decisions must be unanimous. If a trustee is deemed to have lost mental capacity then unanimous decisions are no longer possible. A mentally incapacitated trustee cannot sign any documentation, including Agreements for Sale and Purchase of Real Estate and even a Deed of Retirement of Trustee to enable them to be removed from Trust property. It is advisable to retire a trustee that falls into this category before they lose their mental capacity. Otherwise, an application to the Court is the only way in which you can remove the trustee and enable the Trust to continue to operate. This is a costly process that can take a number of months. It is important to note that while Enduring Powers of Attorney are very useful documents for dealing with a person’s affairs, they cannot be used for removing a trustee from a Trust. Adult Beneficiaries The beneficiaries of your Trust may be your children who are now adults. Perhaps it is suitable for a particular child or children to play a role in the administration of the Trust. It is common for settlors (holding the power of appointment of trustees) to appoint their adult children as replacement trustees in their Will if the Trust is to operate beyond their passing. However, involving your adult children in the Trust during your lifetime could be a beneficial learning experience and lighten the load on other trustees, rather than waiting until your death to thrust the new-found duty upon them. Professional Trustees A professional trustee’s retirement from accounting or law may be on the cards or you have moved your Trust’s affairs to a new firm. Appointing a new professional trustee or a trustee company could be a prudent change and is often easier to do while your existing independent trustee is still around and able to sign documents. A change in trusteeship is usually formalised by a Deed of Retirement and Appointment of Trustees to be signed by the retiring, continuing and new trustees. Once the deed is signed, it can then be used as the base document to implement the change of ownership of the Trust’s assets. This could include real estate, shares and other investments. Bank accounts and insurance policies also have to be updated. Changing the trustees of your Trust is not a two minute task, however, it is a process that enables the smooth operation of your Trust which ultimately benefits all involved. Holland Beckett can guide you through the process. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any queries.

Upcoming Changes in Trust Law

Trusts are a firmly established mechanism for protecting and managing assets in New Zealand. The upcoming changes in trust law are long overdue. However, such changes are also sure to call into question the country’s fixation with family trusts. The Trusts Bill (“the Bill”) was introduced on 1 August 2017, following multiple reviews conducted by the Law Commission, which branded the Trustee Act 1956 (“the Act”) as out-dated and inaccessible. The Bill is to replace this Act and also the Perpetuities Act 1964. It is intended to make trust law more manageable by clarifying the key features of a trust, outlining trustees\' powers and obligations and streamlining administration processes. The Bill outlines 5 mandatory trustee duties which cannot be negated by the terms of a trust. Trustees will have the duty to know and act in accordance with the terms of the trust, act honestly and in good faith, act for the benefit of beneficiaries or to further the purpose of the trust, and to exercise their powers for proper use. The Bill also establishes 10 default trustee duties which must be performed by a trustee unless modified or excluded by the terms of the trust. These default duties largely reflect the current law. Both classes of duties will provide trustees with a clear understanding of their role and aid in beneficiaries holding trustees accountable for their actions, omissions and decisions. Trustees will have to come to terms with disclosure requirements in favour of beneficiaries; a courtesy many beneficiaries are not afforded today. Part 3 of the Bill incorporates the presumption that basic information in relation to the trust’s affairs must be provided to beneficiaries. The provisions specify core documents which must be kept and for how long and the factors to be considered when determining what information should be shared or withheld. Part 4 of the Bill contains provisions concerning trustees\' powers and indemnities. Trustees\' powers are currently minimal and scattered throughout the Act. The powers under the Bill are clear and flexible; providing trustees with more discretion in managing, investing and distributing trust property. In some aspects, the Bill endeavours to make trust administration easier and inexpensive. For example, costs are to be minimised through no longer having to apply to the court for straightforward or contested changes of trustee appointments. The High Court will still have jurisdiction to review a trustee’s act, omission or decision, extend a trustee’s powers and give orders. However, alternative dispute resolution is encouraged throughout the Bill. Whilst the Bill will undoubtedly modernise a considerably out of date piece of legislation, the focus on trustees\' mandatory and default duties, together with the new beneficiary disclosure requirements, will impose greater compliance obligations on trustees. The additional costs of compliance may cause some to question if the administrative hassle begins to outweigh the actual benefit of keeping or forming a family trust in certain circumstances. The Bill has yet to have its first reading, so it is crucial that settlors and trustees of existing trusts continue to be aware of the proposed changes outlined above in anticipation of the changes coming into force. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any queries. This article was written for First Mortgage Trust.